Drawing for BIGGIE BEST

USPTO serial 74219366

BIGGIE BEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIGGIE BEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesley Witt Craig

LESLEY WITT CRAIG TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREWSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016picturesABANDONED—
020furniture and related goods; namely, tables, chairs, and dolly vardens; namely, dressing tables; and home furnishing products; namely, cushions, and photo framesABANDONED—
021picnic baskets; steamer baskets; wastepaper baskets; wicker, straw, wood and cloth baskets; toilet tissue holders, facial tissue holders; and dustbinsABANDONED—
024bed and table covers; quilts; bed linens; duvets; sheets; pillow cases; fabric table cloths; oven gloves; fabric bath mats; and curtainsABANDONED—
027wall covering made of vinyl coated paperABANDONED—
028stuffed toysABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 1996EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 1996EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 28, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 2, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 5, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 1, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance