CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RICHARTZ SOLINGEN

USPTO serial 74219727

RICHARTZ SOLINGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1872254Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 1995
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RICHARTZ SOLINGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEBOX 900RIVERDALE, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008cutlery; namely, pocket knives, butcher knives, hunting knives, razors, scissors, travel knives; household knives; namely, bread knives, vegetable knives, paring knives, ham slicers, meal knives, fruit knives, potato peelers, kitchen knives, butter spreaders, cheese knives, sausage knives, frozen food knives; manicure sets; manually operated gardening tools; namely, pruners, secateurs, hedge trimmers, lawn shears, budding knives, pruning knives; electricians' knivesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2005CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 21, 20018.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 10, 20018.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 12, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 14, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 10, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 3, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance