USPTO serial 74219728
LIBERTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIBERTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1, GB
London W1, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST N WTHIRD FL WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper and paper articles; namely address books, photograph albums, paper bath mats, bathroom tissue, bond paper, appointment books, notebooks, recipe books, calendars, Christmas cards, greeting cards, note cards, coasters made of paper, desk pads, desk sets, envelopes, gift wrapping paper, paper place mats, paper napkins, stationery type folios, post cards, scrap books, scratch pads, stationery writing paper and envelopes, table linens made of paper, table mats made of paper, table cloths made of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | small domestic utensils and containers; namely, paper dinnerware, paper plates, paper cups; plastic bowls; candle holders not of precious metal, candle rings not of precious metal, candlesticks not of precious metal; coasters; containers for food; cups made of plastic; plastic dinnerware; candle holders; plastic dinnerware; plastic forks, spoons, and knives; napkin holders; napkin rings not made of precious metals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |