USPTO serial 74220557
EASY DOES IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY DOES IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded videocassette tapes concerning health and fitness | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | books, newsletters, magazines, printed instruction cards and instruction manuals concerning health and fitness | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | education and entertainment services; namely, conducting workshops, seminars, and classes concerning health and fitness; and a continuing television series concerning health and fitness | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |