USPTO serial 74220722
ISOLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rober A. Gilcrest
ROBER A GILCREST A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONEMENS, HURD, KEGLER & RITTER65 E STATE ST STE 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical formulations and control samples for the identification, separation and quantitative determination of biochemicals and biomaterials in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease and disorders, namely hemoglobins of all types, glycosylated hemoglobin, lithoproteins, cholesterol, antibodies of all types, steroids, hormones and enzymes; solutions and gels for electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing, namely resins, polymers, gels, amphilitic materials and electrophoretic marks; solutions and chemical formulations for use in chromatography, namely chromatography resins, and buffered wash solutions; solutions and media for use in analytical equipment using scintillation or fluorescents | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 003 | detergents for use in biological and clinical laboratories | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 005 | diagnostic reagents for clinical medical laboratory use | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 009 | laboratory test kits and apparatus, namely equipment test tube racks, pipettes, Petri dishes, microtubes, cultural trays, syringes, solid and liquid waste receptacles, flask holders, notebook holders, protective laboratory shields and containers, laboratory dispensers, laboratory film, and safety mats for absorbing liquid spills; test kits for use in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease and disorders; apparatus for use in electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing, namely electrophoresis units, power supplies, and gel casting units; test kits for chromatography, namely chromatography columns, racks, valves, pipettes, gradient makers, computerized column readers and spectrophotometers | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |