USPTO serial 74221014
INCOBLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INCOBLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. KIRKPATRICK
RICHARD L KIRKPATRICK CUSHMAN DARBY & CUSHMAN9TH FL E TWR1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unprocessed artificial resins and plastics in the form of liquids, powders or beads; electrically conductive artificial resins and plastics, also in the form of polymer blends, all for use in manufacturing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |