USPTO serial 74221110
DELICE PURE & NATURAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELICE PURE & NATURAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
28060 Landiona, province of Vercelli, IT
28060 Landiona, province of Vercelli, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND A. KURZ
RAYMOND A KURZ ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PC555 THIRTEENTH ST N WSTE 701 EWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet soap, skin soap, bubble bath soap, shampoo, body lotions and creams, hair care products; namely, hair styling gel, hair styling lotions, hair spray, hair lotion fixants, eye-shadows, eye pencils, eye-liner, facial powder, facial make-up remover, nail polish, sun tanning preparation, skin moisturizers and lotions, perfume and lipsticks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |