USPTO serial 74221257
BABIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Studio City, CA
Studio City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurie A. Ebling
LAURIE A EBLING BLISS MCGLYNN, PC30700 TELEGRAPH RD STE 4646BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby and children products; namely, skin and hair soaps; body and bath soaps and oils; body powders; hair conditioning lotions; dentifrices; cosmetics; namely, blusher, lipstick, lip sun protection and moisturizing sticks, face powders, nail polish | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |