USPTO serial 74221270
CASTROL TECHNICLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASTROL TECHNICLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Swindon, Wiltshire SN3 1RE, GB
Swindon, Wiltshire SN3 1RE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert D. Hart III
HERBERT D HART III MCANDREWS, HELD, & MALLOY, LTDNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR 34TH FL500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning, scouring, polishing, degreasing, rust removing, sanitary, paint stripping, and abrasive preparations; soaps; detergents; all for industrial use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |