USPTO serial 74221782
THEFTLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1836035Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 1994
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- TMEO LAW OFFICE 4
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THEFTLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kokomo, IN
Kokomo, IN
Kokomo, IN
TROY, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Baldwin
Craig A. Baldwin Delphi Technologies, Inc.5725 Delphi Drive, MC: 483-400-402Troy, MI 48098-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radios for motor vehicles, which feature a computerized security locking system comprised of software instructions executed in an EEPROM digital processing device | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DELCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DELCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DELCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DELPHI TECHNOLIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THEFTLOCK
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 8, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 10, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 12, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 4, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |