Drawing for USAIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT & SERVICES

USPTO serial 74221985

USAIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT & SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POMPEY, TINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USAIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT & SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH F. NICHOLSON

JOSEPH F NICHOLSON KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042design and development of air cargo facilities for othersABANDONEDMay 7, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 1995ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 1995OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 17, 1993OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 27, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance