USPTO serial 74222010
ENERMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SF-40420 Jyska, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia R. Richard
VIRGINIA R RICHARD KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, ET AL20TH FL711 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electricity meters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |