Drawing for ACTIVI-TEA

USPTO serial 74222071

ACTIVI-TEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVI-TEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I. PEROFF

MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAY 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005vitamin meal replacement foods; namely, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement, meal replacement powders, meal replacement drinks, food bars for use as a meal replacementABANDONED—
030foods; namely, granola-based snack bars, ceareal based snack foods, rice based snack foods, wheat based snack foods, fruit based snack foods and herbal teas for food purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 29, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 14, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 12, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 29, 1993ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance