Drawing for KNOWLEDGE QUEST

USPTO serial 74222606

KNOWLEDGE QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RATTNER, HEIDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNOWLEDGE QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory M. Edalatpour

GREGORY M EDALATPOUR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEARSIXTEENTH FL620 NEWPORT CTR DRNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009compact discs, and computer discs, and study guides and instruction manuals sold with them, specifically in the areas of aeronautics, anthropology, architecture, art, art history, assembly, archeology, astrology, astronomy, behavioral sciences, biology, botany, career development, chemistry, communications, construction, criminology, culinary arts, dance, design, drama, ecology, education, electronics, employee training, energy conservation, energy dissemination, energy use, engineering, environmental design, environmental sciences, event planning, exhibit design, fine arts, fitness, food, gardening, geography, geology, history, humanities, industrial design, information technology, interior design, job training, language, law, literature, maintenance, management, management training, manufacturing, medicine, meteorology, music, mythology, natural history, natural sciences, oceanography, ornithology, philosophy, photography, psychology, physical education, physics, politics, religion, sales, sociology, taxidermy, telepathy, theology, transportation and zoologyABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 1994EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 18, 1994DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 6, 1994EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 6, 1994DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 19, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 6, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 16, 1993EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 13, 1993EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 17, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 26, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 13, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 20, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance