USPTO serial 74223008
WILD CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 1994
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WILD CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. King
SUSAN B KING3 S PINCKNEY STMADISON, WI 53703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | industry newsletter about trading cards for distribution to retailers of trading cards as separate periodical publication or as section of periodical trading card catalog | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |