USPTO serial 74223044
AIRTIME I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRTIME I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry W. Leeds
HENRY W LEEDS TUCKER, FLYER & LEWIS1615 L ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |