USPTO serial 74223540
COLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROCKY HILL, CT
CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
Wethersfield, CT
Other trademarks owned by CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
Wethersfield, CT
Other trademarks owned by CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Rosenburgh
LISA ROSENBURGH ROGERS & WELLS200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0153UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW COLT HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CONNECTICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- Other trademarks owned by CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by CF Intellectual Property Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named COLT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |