USPTO serial 74224220
CINCINNATI DPC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINCINNATI DPC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Hayes
JAMES H HAYES FROST & JACOBS2500 CENTRAL TRUST CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial machines incorporating a laser beam used to cut flat material into shapes, to cut recesses and holes in complex shapes, to weld metals, to heat treat metals, and in etching | ABANDONED | Oct 12, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1997 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |