USPTO serial 74224379
GRIFFITH LABORATORIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRIFFITH LABORATORIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry W. Sufrin
BARRY W SUFRIN LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60611-4212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | sterilization of drugs, medical devices and equipment for others; purification and sanitizing of cosmetics and food products for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Griffith Laboratories Worldwide, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Griffith Laboratories Worldwide, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named GRIFFITH LABORATORIES
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |