USPTO serial 74224422
SNOW BIRD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOW BIRD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr.
J RODMAN STEELE JR QUARLES & BRADY515 N FLAGLER DR - STE 503WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-4323UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts, hats, visors and clothing ties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |