USPTO serial 74224485
LIVE THE DREAM L.A. BLUES LIVE THE DREAM IN L.A. BLUES P.O. BOX 1111 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90089
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVE THE DREAM L.A. BLUES LIVE THE DREAM IN L.A. BLUES P.O. BOX 1111 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90089?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Meadway
JAY K MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's and men's clothing; namely, shirts, pants, jeans, jackets, skirts, coats, shorts, socks, sweaters and sweatsuits; shoes, boots, sneakers and slippers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C.S.F. Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by C.S.F. Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LIVE THE DREAM L.A. BLUES LIVE THE DREAM IN L.A. BLUES P.O. BOX 1111 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90089
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |