USPTO serial 74224816
TIGER*PLOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1994
- Examiner
- GREER, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIGER*PLOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Sugar Land, TX
Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Sugar Land, TX
Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Sugar Land, TX
Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | computer generated maps based on data from the Census Bureau | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named TIGER*PLOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |