USPTO serial 74224862
HEALTHY EATING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTHY EATING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell D. Pawlan
MITCHELL D PAWLAN MITCHELL D PAWLAN & ASSOCIATES LTD20 N CLARK ST STE 1250CHICAGO, IL 60602-4111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheeses, cottage cheeses and other milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ABANDONED | Mar 17, 1991 |
| 030 | cookies, cakes and other bakery goods made in part with sugar, flour, yeast and/or baking powder; ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ABANDONED | Aug 3, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1994 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |