USPTO serial 74225124
MCD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aldo J. Test
ALDO J TEST FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON, ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store services featuring sale of household goods in the form of furniture; mirrors; small domestic utensils and containers; glassware, porcelain and earthenware; cutlery, forks and spoons | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |