USPTO serial 74225235
HANG HEUNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANG HEUNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | pastries including Chinese-style pastries; cakes including chinese festival specialty cakes; candies and desserts; biscuits; bread | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |