USPTO serial 74225238
BULL DURHAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BULL DURHAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stamford, CT
Bowling Green, KY
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
Louisville, KY
Other trademarks owned by BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
Bowling Green, KY
Stamford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scot A. Duvall
SCOT A DUVALL MIDDLETON & REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store and mail order catalog services featuring, tobacco products, luggage, stationery products, foods, clothing, novelty items, tableware, and audio and video recordings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by COPPERFHEAD BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BULL DURHAM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |