USPTO serial 74225285
CELLU-LEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLU-LEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mario A. Martella
MARIO A MARTELLA BEEHLER & PAVITTP O BOX 92400LOS ANGELES, CA 90009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body care gel to assist in the removal of cellulite and sold to distributors for resale through door-to-door or neighborhood group sales campaigns | ABANDONED | Sep 26, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |