USPTO serial 74225825
FLOWLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOWLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen A. Bent
STEPHEN A BENT FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 5003000 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | housemark for full line of mineral and chemical compositions for the treatment of water, fuels, and other fluids; namely, mineral-based filter media; ion deposition crystals for industrial use; chelating agents for use in water and in air purification systems; electrodeposition agents for use in the manufacture and treatment of metals and other solid materials; catalysts for use in industrial fluid treatment processes; mineral-based ion removal granules for use in water purification and treatment; electrodeposition crystals for use in radioactive waste recovery; mineral-based pasteurization and purification media for use in water and foodstuff purification; ion-contributing and ion-level-controlling media for use in industry, research, aquaculture, horticulture and agriculture; mineral-based ion exchange media for use in industry, research, aquaculture, horticulture and agriculture; anti-stick compounds, compositions for use in the manufacture and treatment of numerous articles; metal recovery and scavenging compounds for use in industry, research, aquaculture, horticulture and agriculture; microcathodes and microanodes for use in filtration systems and for use in metal plating technologies | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | housemark for full line of mineral-based fluid treatment and filtering units; namely, water treatment and filtering units, fuel filtering and treatment units, all for use in heating systems, heating equipment, and vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |