USPTO serial 74226078
VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Iandiorio
JOSEPH S IANDIORIO IANDIORIO & DINGMAN260 BEAR HILL RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | medical equipment; namely, laparoscopic coupler | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |