Drawing for VERITUS INC.

USPTO serial 74226808

VERITUS INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERITUS INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold B. Silverman

ARNOLD B SILVERMAN600 GRANT ST 42ND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036health insurance underwriting and administration services and the administration of employee welfare benefit plansABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance