USPTO serial 74227020
REJUVENATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REJUVENATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Cronk
PETER J CRONK SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER2600 ONE READING CTR1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic products for the care and treatment of skin; namely, creams, gels, lotions, astringents, toners, oils, cleansers, masques and clays, moisturizers, toilet soap, facial and body scrubs, massage oil and talc; cosmetic products for make-up; namely, make-up foundations, face powders, blushers, eye shadows, eye pencils, mascara and lipstick; and perfume, cologne and eaux de toilette | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | vitamin preparations, herbal and nutritional supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |