Drawing for MAYA THE BEE

USPTO serial 74227162

MAYA THE BEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAYA THE BEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony H. Handal

ANTHONY H HANDAL80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014chronometers, clocks, alarm clocks, watches, and timersABANDONED—
016chalks, colored pencils, crayons, stickers, paper tablecloths, paper doilies, paper party hats, greeting cards, invitations, stationery, note pads, notebooks, playing cards, coloring books, paint brushes, a series of children's books centering on a fictional bee character and that character's friends, and postersABANDONED—
021hair combs, hair, clothes and shoe brushes, cups, plates, mugs, drinking glasses, honey jars with and without honey serving implements, non-electric tooth brushesABANDONED—
024bed linens, table covers, linens, blankets, bed sheets, pillow cases, quilts, comforters, bedspreads, towels, washcloths, fabrics for the manufacture of clothingABANDONED—
025clothing; namely, slippers, robes, bathing suits, shorts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, dresses, skirts, shirts, jackets, overcoats, raincoats, caps, hats, ties, stockings, socks, and underwearABANDONED—
028toys; namely, skis, balloons, bubble making rings and solution set, plush toys, stuffed toy animals, dolls, balls for playing catch, Christmas tree ornaments, throwing disks and paddle and ball setsABANDONED—
030cakes, honey, mustard, candy, and chewing gumABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 1995DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 8, 1994DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 10, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 6, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance