USPTO serial 74227677
TRY ME!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRY ME!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric S. Marzluf
ERIC MARZLUF CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNTEIN, COHEN ET ALSEVEN PENN CTR 12TH FL1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | electronic toys; namely, electronic toy pistols, electronic toy guns, electronic toy rifles, electronic toy fist and arm weapons, electronic toy beepers, electronic toy robots, electronic toy pistol keychains, electronic toy swords, electronic toy bullhorns, electronic toy dinosaurs with and without keychains, electronic toy airplanes, electronic toy locomotives, electronic toy keyboards, electronic toy push button sound devices, electronic toy phones with and without keychains, electronic toy pagers, electronic toy animals, electronic toy dolls, electronic toy handheld action games, electronic toy guitars, and electronic toy vehicles | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |