USPTO serial 74227990
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN JACKSON & KELLY2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic point of sale terminals incorporating all-purpose cash register and typing functions | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |