USPTO serial 74228842
BIOPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Joseph Hall
1631 BEVERLY BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | corrugated boxes designed to enclose industrial products other than food products; namely, custom corrugated board sheets formed into a box and made from post consumer fiber corrugated containers and having a white liner bleached by a process that produces no detectable dioxin; custom corrugated board sheets formed into a box and made from post consumer fiber corrugated containers, double lined kraft clippings and bag clippings; and custom corrugated board sheets formed into a box and made from post consumer fiber corrugated containers | ABANDONED | Aug 29, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |