USPTO serial 74229329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario M5R 2A2, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5R 2A2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetarian foods; namely, snack foods in bar form consisting primarily of processed fruit, vegetables, soya, skimmed milk and nuts with cereals or grains and malt | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |