USPTO serial 74229711
EMSCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMSCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3N8, CA
WILMINGTON, DE
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3N8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Stemp
WILLIAM R STEMP BARRISTER, SOLICITOR & TRADEMARK AGENTS10TH FL 910 7TH AVE S WCALGARY, AB T2P 3N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer aided engineering device, associated software and manual all sold as a unit and used for assessing printed circuit pack electromagnetic performance by scanning printed circuit packs to assess the level and characteristics of the electric-magnetic emissions thereby generated | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |