USPTO serial 74230305
IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICH, NORMAN J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Triangle Park, NC
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Long
JOHN R LONG NEWSOM, GRAHAM, HEDRICK, BRYSON & KENNON3101 PETTY RD STE 1200DURHAM, NC 27717UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper goods and printed matter; namely, football trading cards | ABANDONED | Jan 28, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1996 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |