USPTO serial 74230668
GAMEPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAMEPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Gravis Computer Technology Ltd.
Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 5B6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Gravis Computer Technology Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir
JAMES R UHLIR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET ALSTE 28001420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | controllers for computers in the field of computer video games | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |