USPTO serial 74231720
N-HAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N-HAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Franciso, CA
San Franciso, CA
San Franciso, CA
Dataline Group Limited Partnership
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dataline Group Limited Partnership
San Franciso, CA
Dataline Group Limited Partnership
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dataline Group Limited Partnership
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Franczyk
JOHN A FRANCZYK BUTLER, RUBIN, NEWCOMER, ET ALTHREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZ STE 1505CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting and development services relating to computer software for retail store management and accounting | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARENA SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ARENA SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ARENA SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Dataline Group Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by ARENA SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Dataline Group Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named N-HAND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |