USPTO serial 74232669
COLD RUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLD RUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Varitz
ROBERT D VARITZ KOLISHCH, HARTWELL, DICKINSON, ET AL520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen fruits and vegetables, frozen onions, frozen onion rings; frozen potatoes; namely, french fried, processed and hashbrowns; frozen meat; frozen fish; frozen chicken; frozen fruit toppings; frozen nut toppings and frozen non-dairy creamers | ABANDONED | Jan 30, 1989 |
| 030 | frozen pot pies; frozen breads and rolls; frozen side dishes and entrees principally composed of pasta; frozen flavored ices; frozen chocolate toppings; frozen marshmallow toppings; frozen topping syrup and frozen pastry shells | ABANDONED | Jan 30, 1989 |
| 032 | frozen fruit juice in concentrate form | ABANDONED | Jan 30, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |