USPTO serial 74232910
OZONE DEFENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OZONE DEFENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George H. Gerstman
GEORGE H GERSTMAN GERSTMAN & ELLIS, LTDTWO N LASALLE ST STE 2010CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin moisturizer, skin cream, lip balm, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, skin care lotions, sun screen lotions, body creams, skin soaps, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, skin cleaning preparation, bath gels, hair gels, personal deodorants, eye liners, eye shadows, mascaras, lip pencils, lipsticks, face powder, makeup removers, eye and general cleansers, tanning lotions, anti-wrinkle creams and lotions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |