Drawing for TOKYO DINER

USPTO serial 74233693

TOKYO DINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2003321Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 24, 1996
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TOKYO DINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marta I. Burgin

MARTA I BURGIN ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030instant noodlesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 17, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2007CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 5, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 11, 2002815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 24, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 2, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 11, 1995EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 17, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 22, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 27, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance