USPTO serial 74234129
ELENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerold I. Schneider
JEROLD I SCHNEIDER DORSEY & WHITNEY, PLLP1330 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products; namely, hair color; bath products; namely, bath oils, bubble bath, bath gels, bath powder, hand soap, personal soap, facial soap, liquid soap, deodorant, talc; cosmetics; namely, blush, lipstick, foundation, powder; skin care products; namely, lotions, creams, gels, moisturizers, sun tan lotions, sun screens, facial treatments, masques, hair depilatory, shaving creams; nail care products; namely, artificial nail tips, nail treatments in the nature of liquid top coats, base coats, nail hardeners, nail ridge fillers, nail strengtheners, and nail polish; polish removers, acrylic nails, nail glue; aerosol and non-aerosol spray nail polish dryers and topcoat nail polish dryers; perfume | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electrical personal care appliances; namely, curling irons and hair setting rollers | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | electrical personal care appliances, namely hair styling dryers and diffusers therefor, and nail dryers | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | bath brushes and hair brushes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Ravid, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Ravid, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ELENA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |