USPTO serial 74234200
AMERICA'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 1996
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AMERICA'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
EARTH CITY, MO
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent V. Carissimi
Vincent V. Carissimi Pepper Hamilton LLPEighteenth and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ frozen fruits and vegetables, shortening, ] fish [, soups and soup mixes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ rice, ] ice cream, [ spices, salt, ] puddings, tea, cookies, breakfast cereals, bread and other bakery products; namely, cakes, pies, rolls and pastry items, sauces and seasonings and vinegar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by MORAN FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AMERICA'S CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |