USPTO serial 74234220
GLARE FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 1995
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLARE FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Joseph Schaeff
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ IP SECTIONGARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | opthalmic lenses and opthalmic lens kits, consisting of opthalmic lenses, lens cleanser and lens cleaning cloths, distributed as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 4, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |