Drawing for THE SCOTCH HOUSE

USPTO serial 74234386

THE SCOTCH HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O LEAR, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SCOTCH HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018travelling bags, purses, duffle bags, tote bags, handbags, shoulder bags, sports bags not being fitted or adapted to carry sports equipment, trunks for travel, toiletry cases sold empty, business card cases, calling card cases, credit card cases, document cases, key cases, overnight cases, passport cases, attache cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, suitcases, briefcases, billfolds, wallets, umbrellas, sporrans parasols walking sticksABANDONED—
025(based on 1(b) clothing for men, women and children, specifically shaped textile linings for coats, shorts, socks, boots, shoes, slippers, sport shoes, trainer shoes, tam o'shanters, belts and sock flashes, (based on section 44(e)and 1(b)) clothing for men, women and children, specifically shawls, scarves, capes, serapes, stoles, pullovers, cardigans, sweatshirts, T-shirts, sweaters, shirts, overcoats, raincoats, jackets, blazers, waistcoats, dressing gowns, trousers, trews, jeans, culottes, dungarees, kilts, dresses, suits (mens and ladies), blousons, skirts, gloves, headsquares, caps, hatsABANDONED—
027rugs and travelling rugsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 3, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 22, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance