USPTO serial 74234757
EZ TABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 1996
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EZ TABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Utsunomiya City, Tochigi Prefecture, JP
Utsunomiya 320, JP
Utsunomiya City, Tochigi Prefecture, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN T GABRIELIDES
JOHN T GABRIELIDES BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for forming, shaping, transporting, and storing dough-based food products, namely extruders, cutters, molders, conveyors, pilers, dusters, flour sweepers, rollers, folding machines, stretchers, and makeup conveyors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rheon Jidoki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Rheon Jidoki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Rheon Jidoki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named EZ TABLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |