USPTO serial 74234957
SELECTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1915301Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 1995
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SELECTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Dore
JANET DORE MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | vending tickets for entertainment and sports events and collecting receipts from ticketing and recordkeeping and accounting related thereto, for ticket sales outlets, theaters, arenas, concert halls, stadiums and other establishments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 7, 1991 |
| 042 | printing tickets for entertainment and sporting events for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 7, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |