USPTO serial 74234991
OMNIPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMNIPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walt Thomas Zielinski
WALT THOMAS ZIELINSKI INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANYCORPORATE RESEARCH CTRLONG MEADOW RDTUXEDO, NY 10987Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photographic processors | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |